When I first saw the trailers which was specifically in 2D I never thought Cameron could pull off a beauty, on first thought I never thought Avatar would be a beauty, I thought I would be watching yet another sci-fi animated stuff. But Cameron has proved again that whenever he serves something on the table its special, whenever he’s there he creates a whole new cinematic experience for all people, young, old, not so old you name it; be it be the machine in Terminator or the unsinkable yet sinking behemoth Titanic, you end up with an awe. I was very curious to watch it, rather dying to watch it when I heard it was made on a whopping 230mn USD budget, now that my dear friends is 10 times our bollywood flick. (Bollywood for sure can never reach that extreme of movie making which Hollywood has excelled in). Sorry for digressing lemme come back to the most awaited movie Avatar.
The story is simple and you can check what it is, I m not going to spend time on explaining the story. In short men go to another world and try to invade it for their purpose. Men plant Sam aka Jake Sully into the tribal people who defects and becomes a part of the tribe. Men and the tribal people led by Jake enter into a war for their own objectives, the war ends with inhabits winning it. The war seems to depict the Vietnamese American war where Americans with all their might couldn’t match the determination of the Vietnamese and eventually had to pull out, while many of the critics observed that the movie drew a parallel from the American freedom war from their British brethren. Well, quite rightly member of the same clan goes against in a bid for freedom, to live freely. U can predict the climax easily, you know who is gonna win and who is gonna lose, you know who might be part of the collateral damage, but the way the climax has been shot is nothing short of marvelous.
The real marvel is the effects, the (virtual ) planet Pandora is brought to reality in such a marvelous form that you are left gaping. Yes dear friend I don’t think I have seen anything as beautiful or should I say as beautifully picturized. The flowers, the trees, the creatures, the Navi’s, the floating mountains, the Avatars, the rides, all are so amazing that you can’t even check your watch, for the fear you might miss something. It’s beautiful people, it really is.
I can’t say much about the thespians here as most of the characters are animated, but the animation never lets you feel its animation here, though you can’t make out a Sam Worthington as an Avatar when compared to the real him. James created/built/sourced a new camera to capture the motion to recreate it into animation and it really pays off the dividends. So his Avatar does a good job, and so does Grace, a scientist. Zoe pulls off a tremendous role in Avatar, being the daughter of the Navi tribal leader, to being a lover to being a amazing hunter. You fight when Zoe does, you can relate to what Zoe feels, when she is emotional, you are enthralled when she does a roller coaster on her ride. The beauty of the animated character is, it looks hell real. All others are as good. Not to mention the role of the hardlined Colonel Miles Quaritch that Stephen Lang plays, the only human who gets the majority of screen presence time as a human. Tough, straight no bullshit Stephen Lang plays it really well; he would have done a better job in Inglorious Basterds than Mr. Brad Pitt.
Avatar was hit even before it was screened anywhere in the world. The initial trailers which were 2 mins though were not that great but caught the attention, added to all of this were the claims of the movie’s budget, some sources estimating it to be over 500 mn USD as well and ofcourse it had to be Cameron backing a project like this. The word of mouth spread quickly and Avatar was in “I must watch it” list soon.
There are few movies post to which you feel an awe about them, you wanna watch them again and again and Avatar is one of them. Treat yourself a whole new visual experience. I can’t describe it. It’s simply a class apart. And yes watch it exclusively in a 3D.
Kurbaan: something you wouldn’t want to Kurbaan your money on
3 things why you shouldn’t watch Kurbaan
- The movie should be called Fana in New York. If you have seen Fana and New York you know the entire script of the movie. I haven’t watched Shoot on Sight so I don’t know if the story gets some of its incline from that movie as well, then it would be called Shoot on Sight in New York while going Fana.
- The movie is very slow, it has gone tooooooo much in detail when it didn’t require that much stuff, not at all a fast paced movie.
- If you are going in for the chemistry between Saif and Kareena you are going to be disappointed. The story doesn’t demand chemistry after a while.
If you are thinking why I m being so sarcastic or being so pessimistic about the movie at the start of my critic itself it’s because I can’t forgive a movie which makes me sleep in between. I don’t know why after Fana and just recently released New York Karan Johar and Rensil had to come up with the same script. Anyways talking about the debutante Rensil who penned the script of Rang de he does a good job on the directors seat. Now here m not contradicting my above statements, the movie is good for a starter. I m trying to compare him with others like Anthony D’souza (Blue) who made a total disaster. Rensil though does do into minutest of minute detail in the movie but the scenes though connected take too long to establish as a real sequence (as one friend quoted “it’s a documentary”). Though he tried his best I would mention a few errors in the movie (that’s the best part J I like finding errors)
- There s this scene where Saif and his colleague try to dump a body when they are intercepted by the police, now the issue is the person is dead for some good number of days, they want it dispose it off coz its stinking, yet when the police fella intercepts them he doesn’t catch a sniff (maybe he had a cold) first mistake forgiven
- The second mistake follows after this, the police guy gets shot and Saif and his friend are chased by just 2 patrol vehicles. Crap, this is America on a shootout on police you will be swarmed by police (maybe some police fellas got stuck in a traffic or their radio shot off) second mistake forgiven
- Time for another mistake, in USA the security has been beefed up big time post 9/11 so if they have the picture of the terrorist with a talibani beard I don’t think their technology is that dumb that you can enter USA with a French beard foxing all authorities and technology
- The last scenes where there’s a bomb explosion the terrorist try to run before they get cordoned off when they explode themselves. If the prime idea was being a suicide bomber why run on being challenged.
Well the movie is good in small slots, some good dialogues like one scene when an American is of the opinion that all Muslims should leave their country Vivek Oberoi states first leave ours, gives out the message in a loud way, leads to a deep introspection why terrorism from a particular religion is rampant, and ofcourse the explosions in the end which look copy book Hollywood. The movie crawls mostly on all fronts suddenly picks up and then slooooooooowws down. It slows down to such an extent sometimes that you can go grab yourself a coffee, get fresh, have a small chit chat, take your own sweet time to be seated yet when you are back you know you haven’t missed anything.
In the end we were fretting singing the song of the movie itself “Kurbaan huaaaa” the only thing our song lacked was the sobs L
Ratings
Screenplay: looks copied errrr inspired
Direction: good for a debutante
Watch it????: (“AND” conditional operator to be used) if you haven’t watched any of the above movies AND if you have the patience of sitting for 3 hours even then think twice
If you knew that the world is gonna end soon after watching this movie you would pray it surely wouldn’t want it to end the way it’s depicted in 2012. Roland Emmerich gets a hattrick of end of civilization movies after Independence Day and Day After Tomorrow. And he succeeds in enthralling the audience the third time in a row. 2012 is set against the Mayan prophesy of the world coming to an end in 2012. (Special news which states that NASA had to build a special team to debunk the myths of Mayan civilization which point out the destruction: http://in.news.yahoo.com/139/20091107/981/tsc-scientists-debunk-six-2012-end-of-th.html). Rumors are rife that the world would come to an end at 2012. Don’t know who would be benefitted from this rumor but the movie must have gained a very good opening across the world. Might be a marketing gimmick by the movie guys, riding on fear, don’t know just speculations which might turn out in favor of the movie. The film revolves around the lives of a few characters that during the course of the movie face a brave death, a accidental death, get stranded or get rescued. One of the stories which presumably is the mainstay of the movie is that of John Cusack, who plays the role of Jackson, a struggling writer and struggling divorced parent trying to get the attention of his kids. Cusack does a lot of justice to the character save for some places where he looks out of place or emotions, he does the bulk of action sequences. Quite aptly supporting him are the characters Adrian (the scientist who first brings the calamity to the govt. notice), Jackson’s wife and Carl the opportunistic rational govt. servant.
Coming back to the real ingredient of the movie, it’s the thrilling action sequences, which really make you jump on your seats, biting your nails and praying that this shouldn’t not happen atleast when we are dying. The first sequence of the earthquake which destroys the whole of California is simply simply non describable. Its about 10 minutes and in 10 minutes you are presented the worst nightmare of you in the form of crumbling buildings, bridges, cars smashing, and the road crumbling beneath you. That 10 minutes is simply what the movie stands for Total Devastation. Had it been a 3D many would have gasped for their breath, so awesome was it. The scene in Tom Cruise's War of the Worlds where the bridge collapses comes a wee bit closer to some parts of this one. The other scenes too are out of the box with flames from the volcano firing like meteors, driving a half burnt cab dodging the meteors like bullet, and then the thick smoke, which threatens to engulf a humongous aircraft, or the giant tsunamis which are big enough for Mount Everest. You can imagine how grand the scenes would have been. But the climax sequences failed to impress me, it wasn't great not even close to the massive earthquake piece which i described earlier. The director could have made this climax a more dramatic one and less thrilling and you end up asking for a better one.
Roland Emmerich draws a lot of parallel from his previous two movies like the President of US of A being nothing less than a hero, either the president or the vice president facing a chopper crash while being escorted to the safe zone, or highlighting the relevance of developing or third world countries i.e. in day after tomorrow it was a south American nation which opened its gates to American refugees, similarly here the prediction of the calamity is brought to light by an Indian Astrophysicist (something to cheer about, fellow Indians J), the new world is Africa, and the safe eviction point being China. But he leaves some minor errors in his direction cum screenplay like for e.g. lets take the example of our own Indian fella the Astrophysicist, our man can talk English in an Indian accent but the blunder is he talks Hindi in an English accent (stumped!!!), second would be when the faithful gather in prayer in Rome with candles, where they are stuck by a massive earthquake, there’s no fire inspite of the innumerable amount of candles (I know the earthquake and the falling of the building was more important but this is Roland) and last but not the least mobiles working in India that too when there is total destruction around (amazing someone please tell Roland that in India you need to have towers). But such minor mistakes go all unnoticed in front of the amazing cataclysmic scenes in the movie.
In the end you come out of the theatre with a awe, talking how great the scenes were, but not completely satisfied I mean (100%), this movie could have been brilliant, it turned out to be a shade lower simply great. I was 95% satisfied by that 5% could have been easily turned to make it a simply superb movie. The story sometimes goes too slow for such a movie, it puts a lot of drama and irrelevant conversations which makes the impact go lose for some time, and some action scenes seemed like they were orphaned like the giant tsunami overturning a giant cruise which ends abruptly. The movie is like a roller coaster ride up and down then suddenly very high, dips and so on. But the action sequences try to plaster the fallen moulds of direction and storyline.
Masand gave a rating of 3 << http://ibnlive.in.com/news/masands-movie-review-2012-is-loud-and-crazy/105204-8.html >>
My take on the movie
Story – Average
Direction – Good
Scenes – CANNOT be COMPARED, BREATHSTOPPING
Watch it – DEFINITELY
I happened to stumble upon Forbes top 10 richest billionaires in the world, the top 3 were no surprises, rather others also, but what caught my eye was this point: the top 5 wealthiest people did not inherit a fortune, one was an immigrant from Lebanon, the other was selling cards, matches, pens and fish on a bicycle, the other sold newspapers as his first job. So what exactly was “the” factor that made them billionaires? People would cite many factors hard work, intelligence, luck, perseverance etc etc. but I would start with “being discontent” as one of the crucial factors. All these people were discontent with the way their current lives was, discontent about the state of affairs, the way business was run. But then you may question aren’t we discontent with the way things are but we are not even millionaires let alone billionaires. Agreed, but see it in this way, haven’t we all seen one of the most intelligent/promising guy/gurl in our school/college become a complete disaster. I feel it’s the discontent, they become satisfied with what they have and do no more. Had Mr. Ingvar Kamprad, become content of selling cards, matches, pens and fish on a bicycle we wouldn’t have seen what is now “Ikea”. But you may ask what if a person is talented, is discontent with the state of affairs but that doesn’t make billionaires. Don’t we the so talented people, fret about the state of affairs, yet are galaxies far from gaining wealth. That brings me to the next point the idea of discomfort should be so harrowing to you it should lead you to change the boring stale state, that’s execution, taking risks. That’s what made Ingvar Kamprad to create Ikea, Carlos Slim to establish one of the biggest telecom networks in Mexico, or the Albrecht brothers to build the chain of Aldi stores.
Friday I'm in Love Lyrics
Artist(Band):The Cure
I don't care if Monday's blue
Tuesday's grey and Wednesday too
Thursday I don't care about you
It's Friday, I'm in love
Monday you can fall apart
Tuesday, Wednesday break my heart
Oh, Thursday doesn't even start
It's Friday I'm in love
Saturday, wait
And Sunday always comes too late
But Friday, never hesitate...
I don't care if Mondays black
Tuesday, Wednesday - heart attack
Thursday, never looking back
It's Friday, I'm in love
Monday, you can hold your head
Tuesday, Wednesday stay in bed
Or Thursday - watch the walls instead
It's Friday, I'm in love
Saturday, wait
And Sunday always comes too late
But Friday, never hesitate...
